Eugene Plawiuk ([info]plawiuk) wrote,
@ 2005-07-14 12:02:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: happy
Current music:Na Na Hey Hey Goodbye

Michael Moore speaks Truth to Power
To all those right wing bloggers who have dumped on Michael Moore, especially after his Fahrenheit 9/11 be afraid be very afraid, your smearing of Mike as liar could end you up in court. And YOU WILL LOSE.
So get off your hobby horse of smearing Mike, and find someone your own size to pick on, like a cockroach, or centipide.


Judge rules statements in Michael Moore movie true

Last Updated Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:26:17 EDT
CBC Arts

A judge has thrown out a libel and defamation suit against filmmaker Michael Moore by the brother of Terry Nichols, one of the Oklahoma City bombers.

James Nichols claimed statements made in Moore's 2002 Oscar-winning documentary Bowling for Columbine could be misinterpreted and link him directly to the 1995 bombing that killed 168 people.


Filmmaker Michael Moore (CP Photo)

Judge Paul Borman of the U.S. District Court in Detroit dismissed the claims and ruled comments made about James Nichols were "factual and substantially true."

Bowling for Columbine is a searing examination of gun culture in America and contains a segment where Moore visits Nichols at his Michigan soybean farm.

Nichols' farm was raided two days after the bombing and he was held as a material witness for 32 days. He was released because of lack of evidence. His brother, Terry Nichols, is serving two life sentences without parole for his role in the attack. Timothy McVeigh was executed in 2001 for masterminding the bombing.

Nichols had argued that Bowling for Columbine should not have:

  • used the term "practice bombs" in reference to Nichols, McVeigh and brother Terry making explosives on his farm.
  • said that Nichols was arrested in association with the bombing.
  • used a phrase that alleges federal agents couldn't get "the goods" on James Nichols.

Nichols contends the film invaded his privacy and caused emotional distress.

Moore's lawyer, Herschel Fink, told the court Nichols' claims ranged from "the frivolous to the silly."

Fink argued Moore's film was based on court documents and items from reliable news companies. He said the statements in the film also are protected because Nichols is a public figure – he has written a book, given speeches and appeared in several media interviews.

Moore, an outspoken activist, has made his name in such documentaries as Fahrenheit 9/11 and Roger and Me.





Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…